SUBJECTIVE ATTITUDE TO REMOTE WORK AMONG SPECIALISTS WITH DIFFERENT INDIVIDUAL-TYPOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN COVID-19 CIRCUMSTANCES

Authors

  • M. Shirokaya Lomonosov Moscow State University
  • O. Zhukova Lomonosov Moscow State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31618/ESSA.2782-1994.2021.3.73.124

Keywords:

Distance work, specialists, job satisfaction, professional success, individual typological characteristics, cognitive styles.

Abstract

The study is focussed on the specialist’s with different individual-typological characteristics attitude to the changed conditions for accomplishing work tasks, satisfaction and professional success in the conditions of remote work during global pandemic. Objectives of the study: learn about the attitude specifics of the specialists with different individual-typological characteristics (cognitive styles) to remote work, job satisfaction during pandemic and professional success.

The study involved 120 respondents. To obtain the results a professional psychological questionnaire and a methodology of individual typological characteristics (L.N.Sobchik) were used. As a result of the analysis, it was found that respondents with different cognitive styles differ among themselves in the indicator of assessing the duration of working hours after the introduction of a remote work format, a subjective indicator of preference (choice) of a remote work format over face-to-face and professional success in these conditions. Respondents with formal-logical, verbal and accentuated cognitive styles noted an increase in the duration of working hours during switching to a remote work format and they had the lowest indicators of professional work success. Individuals with visual-figurative and intuitive cognitive styles did not notice an increase in the duration of working hours due to the transition to a distance with the highest indicators of professional success in activity. It is concluded that the

"stress of time" was a valid factor influencing the decrease in professional success in the conditions of universal telecommuting in a pandemic. No connection was found between the cognitive styles of the respondents and the subjective assessment of job satisfaction in a distant setting.

Author Biographies

M. Shirokaya , Lomonosov Moscow State University

Phd in Psychology, assistant professor, Faculty of Psychology

O. Zhukova , Lomonosov Moscow State University

Graduate specialist, Faculty of Psychology

References

Avdeeva I.Yu. Organizaciya i kontrol deyatelnosti distancionnyh rabotnikov – Aktualnye voprosy ucheta i upravleniya v usloviyah informacionnoj ekonomiki. – 2019. – S. 230.

Alyoshina A. B. Vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya vynuzhdennogo udalennogo formata raboty: Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakulteta. – 2020. – № 12(4). – S. 44-55.

Arutyunyan Yu.I., Plyakich B.M. Distancionnoe upravlenie personalom sovremennoj organizacii – Colloquium-journal. – No 10-8 (62). – 2020. – 30 s.

Gebert D., Rozenshtil L. Organizacionnaya psihologiya. Chelovek i organizaciya. – Harkov: Gumanitarnyj centr. – 2006. – 624 s.

Klimov E.A. Vvedenie v psihologiyu truda: uchebnik. Seriya: Vysshee professionalnoe obrazovanie. – Moskva: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta. – 2004. – 336 s.

Organizacionnaya psihologiya. Uchebnik. Pod red. Leonovoj A.B. – Moskva: INFRA-M. – 2019. – 429 s.

Sobchik L.N. Psihologiya individualnosti. Teoriya i praktika psihodiagnostiki. – SPb.: Rech. – 2005. – 624 s.

Trudovoj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 30.12.2001 № 197-FZ (red. ot 28.06.2021) //

Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF. 07.01.2002. № 1 (ch. 1). Gl.49. St. 312. – S.137-139.

Ozimek A. The Future of Remote Work. // Upwork Press Releases. – 2020.

Barrero J.M., Bloom N., Davis S.J. Why Working From Home Will Stick – Becker Friedman Institute. – 2020.

Published

2021-10-10

Issue

Section

Статьи