MODEL FOR FORMING OF ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN UKRAINE

V. Dziundziuk; S. Merezhko

doi:10.31618/ESSA.2782-1994.2021.5.68.29

Автор(и)

V. Dziundziuk Kharkiv Regional Institute for Public Administration of National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine
S. Merezhko Kharkiv Regional Institute for Public Administration of National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31618/ESSA.2782-1994.2021.5.68.29

Ключові слова:

anti-corruption strategies

Анотація

Formulation of the problem. Different countries have different anti-corruption strategies. However, just separate strategies to combat such a complex phenomenon as corruption are not enough; a purposeful and long-term public policy is needed, of which the mentioned strategies will be a part. And, in our opinion, such a policy should be based on the United Nations Convention against Corruption [7], which has been created as a strong base and legal framework for the fight against corruption. This Convention is unique as it is grounded on a shared understanding of the dangers and negative consequences of corruption from a wide range of participating states. However, there is a downside: while the Convention provides new

opportunities and guidance for national policy and anticorruption measures, it can also create new issues in this area, for example, the temptation to take too many anti-corruption measures at the same time, which will lead to negative results and undermine the faith of citizens in anti-corruption efforts.

Біографії авторів

V. Dziundziuk , Kharkiv Regional Institute for Public Administration of National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor, Head of Political Science and Philosophy Chair

S. Merezhko , Kharkiv Regional Institute for Public Administration of National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

Postgraduate student of Political Science and Philosophy Chair

Посилання

Brager, G., Specht, H., Torczyner, J.L. (1987). Community organizing. New York: Columbia University Press.

Brinkerhoff, D.W. (2000). Assessing political will for anticorruption efforts: an analytic framework. Public Administration, Dec. 20(3): 239-248.

Campos, J.E., Pradhan, S. (2006). The many faces of corruption – Tracking vulnerabilities at the sector level, World Bank, Washington D.C., USA.

Hussmann, K (ed.) (2007). U4 Report - AntiCorruption Making in Practice: What can be learned for the implementation of Article 5 of UNCAC? Available at: www.u4.no/themes/uncac.

Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.Y. (1994). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

United Nations Convention against Corruption. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/P ublications/Convention/0850026_E.pdf.

United Nations Development Programme (2016). Citizen engagement in public service delivery: the critical role of public officials. Available at: https://www.alnap.org/help-library/citizenengagement-in-public-service-delivery-the-criticalrole-of-public-officials.

Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., Milis, K. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40 (1): 5-32.

Waheduzzaman, W., As-Saber, S. (2015), Community participation and local governance in Bangladesh. Australian Journal of Political Science, 50(1): 128-147.